The Veteran's left and right heel spurs were granted initial 10 percent ratings.,The Veteran's left radial neck fracture was not granted a higher rating.,The Veteran's HIV manifestations were granted a 30 percent rating.,The Veteran's hypertension, frostbite residuals of the left hand fingers 3-5, and shingles received appropriate ratings.,Prior to July 28, 2017, the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was not granted a higher rating. From July 28, 2017, his bilateral hearing loss was granted an 80 percent rating.,The Veteran's TDIU after July 28, 2017, was denied.
The deciding factor: The evidence supported the grant of initial ratings for the heel spurs and radial neck fracture. The HIV manifestations were rated at the minimum level due to recurrent constitutional symptoms, intermittent diarrhea, and on approved medication(s). The Veteran's hypertension, frostbite residuals, and shingles received appropriate ratings based on their severity. Prior to July 28, 2017, his bilateral hearing loss was not granted a higher rating; from that date, he was granted an 80 percent rating.
- Claimed conditions
- left heel spur, right heel spur, left radial neck fracture, HIV manifestations
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- January 8, 2019
- Citation
- 19101624
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,170 · Granted: 38% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19101624.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's appeal to restore service connection for left foot plantar fasciitis, finding that the original award was clearly and unmistakably erroneous.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection of his right heel spur, finding that it is at least as likely as not related to his in-service plantar fasciitis.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found errors in the decision and has ordered additional examinations to determine if the Veteran's ankle conditions and left foot stress fractures are related to his service. The claims for right foot/toes numbness, right heel spur, and left foot stress fractures remain pending.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including residuals of a right forearm burn, left and right shin splints, chronic disability manifested by right toe numbness, back and right hip disabilities as well as left and right heel spurs. The most probative evidence shows that these conditions were not present during or due to her military service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.