The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable evaluation for erythema multiforme is being remanded due to the submission of additional VA treatment records since the May 2016 statement of the case. The AOJ will review these new records and readjudicate the issue.
The deciding factor: New evidence was submitted by the Veteran, necessitating a full review and reconsideration of his claim.
- Claimed conditions
- erythema multiforme
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 10, 2019
- Citation
- 19102614
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,549 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19102614.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted a TDIU effective November 10, 1998. The Veteran's service-connected conditions of COPD, GERD, and skin disorders have rendered him unemployable since at least that date.
- Granted
The Veteran's erythema multiforme prevents him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation, and he is granted a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU).
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's skin disabilities are associated with gas chamber training during service. The Board has ordered a VA examination to determine the presence and relation of these disabilities to his service.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for revision of a November 1969 rating decision that assigned a noncompensable rating for erythema multiforme, finding no clear and unmistakable error in the original determination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.