The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient information regarding the location of a KMAG Detachment north of Chunchon along the DMZ, which is crucial for determining whether the Veteran was exposed to herbicide agents and thus eligible for presumptive service connection for type 2 diabetes mellitus.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the AOJ failed to address the specific question regarding the location of the KMAG Detachment north of Chunchon along the DMZ, which is necessary for determining whether the Veteran was exposed to herbicide agents and thus eligible for presumptive service connection for type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- Claimed conditions
- type 2 diabetes mellitus
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 15, 2019
- Citation
- 19103345
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeals for earlier effective dates related to various left and right hip, knee, shoulder, and other conditions as they were freestanding claims not continuously pursued from the initial rating decisions.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for prostatitis, HIV, CHF, GERD, herpes, a pulmonary disability, headaches, and type 2 diabetes mellitus as the evidence did not support a finding of a current disability or a nexus to service or a service-connected disability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for type 2 diabetes mellitus, colon cancer, and an initial compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss to secure additional evidence.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for type 2 diabetes mellitus as the evidence did not support a finding of in-service disease or injury indicative of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and there was no credible evidence to establish exposure to herbicide agents on a direct basis.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.