The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses from July 7, 2015, through July 10, 2015, at South Georgia Medical Center are reimbursed as the treatment was for an emergency condition and a VA facility was not feasibly available.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the non-VA medical care provided by SGMC on July 7, 2015, constituted an emergency due to the Veteran's reported leaking blood at home and dysuria. Additionally, there was no feasible alternative VA facility with an emergency department within a reasonable time.
- Claimed conditions
- acute on chronic kidney injury, gross hematuria, urinary tract infection
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 15, 2019
- Citation
- 19103437
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 3,038 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19103437.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the issues of service connection for extreme fatigue, difficulty breathing, sepsis, and urinary tract infection due to incomplete records and a need for additional medical opinions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to an inadequate medical opinion, and a new one must be provided.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for the cause of death, finding that there is no evidence to support a causal relationship between the Veteran's military service or VA treatment and his death.,The Board also denied DIC under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 and DIC under 38 U.S.C. § 1318, as there was no evidence of fault on the part of VA in the care provided to the Veteran.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew her appeal before the Board made a decision, and therefore the appeal is dismissed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.