Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's daughter is seeking accrued benefits, but the RO denied them. The Board notes that a claim for SMC is a claim for increased rating and can be effective up to one year prior to the date of claim if the increase in disability occurred during that period. As such, the case is remanded for further consideration.

The deciding factor: The provisions of 38 C.F.R. 3.400(o)(2) leave open the possibility of the assignment of an effective date prior to April 30, 2013, which could affect the denial as a matter of law with application of 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.31 and 3.500(g).

Claimed conditions
Not specified in this decision
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 15, 2019
Citation
19103733

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.