Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's kidney stones are found to be related to his service, and he is granted service connection for this condition.,His Graves Disease does not warrant a rating in excess of 10 percent as it did not manifest with tachycardia or increased pulse pressure. The issue of entitlement to an initial compensable evaluation for right elbow lateral epicondylitis and left elbow lateral epicondylitis is remanded.,The Veteran's service-connected right hand strain, right elbow lateral epicondylitis, and right leg shin splints are all found to be related to his service. The issue of entitlement to an initial compensable evaluation for left elbow lateral epicondylitis and left leg shin splints with left ankle status post ORIF fracture and scar is also remanded.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's kidney stones developed while on active duty and have persisted since separation, meeting the criteria for service connection.,The Veteran’s Graves Disease did not manifest as tachycardia or increased pulse pressure, thus not warranting a higher rating. The issue of right elbow lateral epicondylitis and left elbow lateral epicondylitis is remanded due to inadequate examination findings.,Right hand strain, right elbow lateral epicondylitis, and right leg shin splints are found to be related to service. Left elbow lateral epicondylitis and left leg shin splints with left ankle status post ORIF fracture and scar are also found to be related to service.

Claimed conditions
kidney stones, Graves Disease, right hand strain, right elbow lateral epicondylitis, left elbow lateral epicondylitis, right leg shin splints, left leg shin splints
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 23, 2019
Citation
19105125

Veterans Law Judge

M. Donohue

Decisions by this judge: 1,762 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19105125.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.