Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for sleep apnea is denied as there is no evidence of a current disability related to an in-service event, injury, or disease.,Service connection for bladder cancer is also denied due to the lack of any documented onset during active duty and insufficient medical evidence linking it to service.,The Veteran's claim for erectile dysfunction secondary to prostate cancer is remanded as there is no objective evidence of a current deformity of the penis that would warrant a compensable rating under Diagnostic Code 7522.,Service connection for prostate cancer, status post radical retropubic prostatectomy, remains denied with an initial noncompensable rating and no effective date provided.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's service treatment records do not show any complaints or findings related to sleep apnea, bladder cancer, erectile dysfunction, or prostate cancer. The earliest documented evidence of these conditions is many years after separation from active duty.,There is insufficient medical evidence linking the Veteran’s current diagnoses of bladder cancer and prostate cancer to his military service. The earliest documentation of bladder cancer is in 2012, over 37 years post-service.,The Veteran has not provided objective evidence of a current deformity of the penis that would warrant a compensable rating under Diagnostic Code 7522 for erectile dysfunction secondary to prostate cancer.,Service connection for prostate cancer remains denied as there is no effective date provided, indicating that the claim may still be pending or further development is needed.

Claimed conditions
sleep apnea, bladder cancer, erectile dysfunction, prostate cancer
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 24, 2019
Citation
19105490

Veterans Law Judge

KELLI A. KORDICH

Decisions by this judge: 2,287 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19105490.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.