The Veteran's appeal is remanded for a new examination to determine the current level of severity of his right ear hearing loss.
The deciding factor: New evidence has been presented that may indicate an increase in the severity of the service-connected right ear hearing loss since the last examination.
- Claimed conditions
- Left Great Toe Fracture, Left Foot Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthritis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 24, 2019
- Citation
- 19105789
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,050 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19105789.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities have rendered him unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation, thus meeting the criteria for a TDIU.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's left great toe fracture has been rated as 10 percent disabling since November 5, 2012. The rating is based on the current functional impairment of the left great toe.
- Whole decision: Denied
The veteran's claims for higher initial ratings for his low back and left toe disabilities, as well as a TDIU claim, were denied by the Board.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the appellant's claims for increased evaluations for his left great toe disability and left foot disability, finding that the evidence did not support an evaluation in excess of 20 percent prior to January 31, 1997, or a separate compensable evaluation for surgical scarring. The appellant's service-connected disabilities were found not to combine to prevent substantially gainful employment.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.