The Board has remanded the cases due to incomplete information and consideration of whether a TDIU should be referred for extra-schedular review. The special monthly compensation claim is also held in abeyance pending completion of these tasks.
The deciding factor: Incomplete information provided by the appellant prevented full adjudication, and the TDIU issue must be reviewed for possible extra-schedular consideration.
- Claimed conditions
- shell fragment wound residuals
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 24, 2019
- Citation
- 19106022
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,421 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19106022.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted TDIU with an effective date of August 21, 2020. The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is remanded for further examination and opinion.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction, to include as secondary to shell fragment wound residuals, PTSD, diabetes mellitus, and prostate cancer is being remanded due to the need for additional development of medical records.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected shell fragment wound scars of the right lower extremity with retained foreign body have been rated at 10 percent prior to October 22, 2014. The Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted for this period.
- Denied
The Veteran's death was not determined to be service-connected, and the appellant is not entitled to DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 because he did not meet the criteria for a 'deceased veteran' as defined in the regulation.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.