Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's former attorney, J.W., is entitled to attorney fees based on a grant of past due benefits in the April 2017 rating decision. However, the Veteran has not received proper notice of this appeal and must be provided with copies of the September 2017 SOC and the content of his substantive appeal.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's former attorney J.W. is entitled to attorney fees based on a grant in an April 2017 rating decision, but the Veteran has not received proper notice of this appeal and must be provided with copies of the September 2017 SOC and the content of his substantive appeal.

Claimed conditions
Not specified in this decision
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 29, 2019
Citation
19106141

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.