The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for additional left eye disabilities resulting from VA medical and surgical treatment from November 2007 to August 2008, finding that the Veteran's conditions were not caused by or a result of VA care.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran’s pre-existing conditions (diabetes mellitus) caused his left eye disabilities, and that VA did not cause these conditions through its treatment. The additional disability was reasonably foreseeable as part of standard diabetic retinopathy management.
- Claimed conditions
- Left eye retinal detachment, Macular edema, Proliferative diabetic retinopathy, Epiretinal membrane, Diabetic macular edema, Vitreous floaters
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 29, 2019
- Citation
- 19106454
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,549 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19106454.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's vitreous floaters are granted service connection. The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder is denied a rating in excess of 50 percent prior to June 7, 2023 and thereafter.
- Granted
The Veteran's cervical strain and vitreous floaters have been granted service connection as they are directly related to his military service.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings and earlier effective dates, as the evidence did not support a higher rating or an earlier effective date.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for an acquired psychiatric disorder due to a lack of definitive opinion regarding its onset in service. The other two conditions (hypertension and macular edema) have been denied as not related to service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.