The Board has decided to remand the case due to a need for an appropriate VA aid and attendance examination to determine if the appellant meets the requirement for aid and attendance based on her vision.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not indicate that the appellant meets the factual need for regular aid and attendance of another person, but further evaluation is needed to assess her visual acuity or field contraction.
- Claimed conditions
- Not specified in this decision
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 29, 2019
- Citation
- 19106980
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.