The Veteran's claim for service connection for breast cancer was denied due to lack of evidence linking the condition to her military service. The Board has now reopened the claim and found that new evidence supports a reopening, but still denies service connection as there is no direct link between the Veteran's current diagnosis and her military service.
The deciding factor: The preponderance of medical opinions does not support a finding that breast cancer was caused by herbicide agent exposure during service.
- Claimed conditions
- Breast Cancer
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 1, 2019
- Citation
- 19108152
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 631 · Granted: 21% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19108152.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for PTSD, infertility, osteopenia, and breast cancer are being remanded due to the need for further development.,Entitlement to a higher rating for PTSD is denied.
- Partly granted
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for hypertension and remanded claims for service connection for atopic dermatitis, breast cancer, and depression as secondary to breast cancer.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that the Veteran is entitled to a remand for an addendum medical opinion regarding her claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of a double mastectomy, as she contends that VA negligence led to her breast cancer and subsequent mastectomy.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty-to-assist error and for an examination, as well as for opinions on the relationship between the Veteran's service-connected diabetes and his diagnosed breast cancer.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.