The Board has remanded the claim for a bilateral heel disorder due to incomplete service treatment records and lack of medical opinion regarding the etiology of the condition. The Veteran's lay statements about prior injuries in service are considered, but further examination is needed.
The deciding factor: Further examination is required to determine if the Veteran's current heel disorder is related to his military service.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral heel disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 5, 2019
- Citation
- 19108556
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,612 · Granted: 16% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19108556.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims of service connection for bilateral knee disorder and bilateral heel disorder due to a lack of VA examinations prior to the initial rating decision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and development of his claims for service connection for lumbar spine, bilateral heel, and shin disorders.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including a bilateral heel disorder, flat feet, fibromyalgia, sleep apnea, gastrointestinal disorders, and erectile dysfunction prior to May 23, 2011. The decision is based on the lack of evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board found no credible evidence of in-service injuries or symptoms that would support service connection for the claimed conditions, including headaches, low back disorder, bilateral heel disorder, and left shoulder disorder. As a result, these claims were denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.