The Board has denied service connection for left and right lower extremity conditions, as well as left and right upper extremity conditions. The claims are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not support a finding of service connection for any of the claimed conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- left lower extremity condition, right lower extremity condition, left upper extremity condition, right upper extremity condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 5, 2019
- Citation
- 19108950
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,614 · Granted: 35% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19108950.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has identified errors in the original decision and remands all claims for further development, including consideration of potential PACT Act exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's left lower extremity condition, including a heel drop due to nerve impingement in his back and atrophy in his left calf, is currently rated 10 percent disabling. The Board has remanded the case for further examination and reconsideration of diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's conditions. The Veteran is required to undergo further examinations and provide updated medical opinions.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's application for VA educational assistance benefits under Chapter 30 was denied because he did not meet the service requirements for eligibility, specifically due to his uncharacterized discharge from active duty.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.