The Veteran's initial claim for an increased rating for loss of sense of smell associated with Parkinson’s disease was denied. A 10 percent evaluation is granted.,An initial compensable evaluation prior to December 7, 2015, for constipation associated with Parkinson’s disease was denied. A 10 percent evaluation beginning December 7, 2015, for constipation associated with Parkinson’s disease is granted.,The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for dysphasia associated with Parkinson’s disease was denied. The initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent prior to December 7, 2015, for bradykinesia of the left lower extremity associated with Parkinson’s disease was denied. A 10 percent evaluation beginning December 7, 2015, for bradykinesia of the left lower extremity associated with Parkinson’s disease is granted.,The Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent prior to December 7, 2015, for bradykinesia of the right lower extremity associated with Parkinson’s disease was denied. A 10 percent evaluation beginning December 7, 2015, for bradykinesia of the right lower extremity associated with Parkinson’s disease is granted.,The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable evaluation for erectile dysfunction associated with Parkinson’s disease was remanded.,The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations for loss of automatic movements of the right side and left side of face associated with Parkinson’s disease were both remanded.,The Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for cognitive impairment or dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease was remanded.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's conditions are rated under appropriate DCs, and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted based on the evidence provided.
- Claimed conditions
- loss of sense of smell, constipation, dysphasia, bradykinesia of left lower extremity, bradykinesia of right lower extremity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 6, 2019
- Citation
- 19108998
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,104 · Granted: 28% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19108998.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's appeal for special monthly compensation and service connection was denied due to a late filing of the Board Appeal request.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeals for all the listed conditions in April 2024 and March 2025, thus dismissing the appeal.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's disability picture, primarily due to Parkinson's disease and related manifestations, does not meet the criteria for SMC at the statutory housebound level as his other disabilities do not yield a combined rating of 60 percent.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's disability picture, primarily due to Parkinson's disease and related manifestations, does not meet the criteria for SMC at the statutory housebound level as his other disabilities do not yield a combined rating of 60 percent.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.