Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's initial claim for an increased rating for loss of sense of smell associated with Parkinson’s disease was denied. A 10 percent evaluation is granted.,An initial compensable evaluation prior to December 7, 2015, for constipation associated with Parkinson’s disease was denied. A 10 percent evaluation beginning December 7, 2015, for constipation associated with Parkinson’s disease is granted.,The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for dysphasia associated with Parkinson’s disease was denied. The initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent prior to December 7, 2015, for bradykinesia of the left lower extremity associated with Parkinson’s disease was denied. A 10 percent evaluation beginning December 7, 2015, for bradykinesia of the left lower extremity associated with Parkinson’s disease is granted.,The Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent prior to December 7, 2015, for bradykinesia of the right lower extremity associated with Parkinson’s disease was denied. A 10 percent evaluation beginning December 7, 2015, for bradykinesia of the right lower extremity associated with Parkinson’s disease is granted.,The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable evaluation for erectile dysfunction associated with Parkinson’s disease was remanded.,The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations for loss of automatic movements of the right side and left side of face associated with Parkinson’s disease were both remanded.,The Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for cognitive impairment or dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease was remanded.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's conditions are rated under appropriate DCs, and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted based on the evidence provided.

Claimed conditions
loss of sense of smell, constipation, dysphasia, bradykinesia of left lower extremity, bradykinesia of right lower extremity
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
10%
Decision date
February 6, 2019
Citation
19108998

Veterans Law Judge

M. H. HAWLEY

Decisions by this judge: 1,104 · Granted: 28% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19108998.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.