Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has remanded two issues: service connection for hypertension and service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities. The Veteran's hypertension is related to his in-service exposure to herbicide agents or his service-connected diabetes mellitus, but a VA examination is needed to determine if it is at least as likely as not that the hypertension began during active service, was noted during service with continuity of symptomatology since service, or is proximately due to service-connected diabetes mellitus. The same applies for peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities.

The deciding factor: The Board found the Veteran's claims for hypertension and peripheral neuropathy are related to his in-service exposure to herbicide agents or his service-connected diabetes mellitus, but a VA examination is needed to determine if these conditions began during active service, were noted during service with continuity of symptomatology since service, or are proximately due to service-connected diabetes mellitus.

Claimed conditions
hypertension, peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper extremities, peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 7, 2019
Citation
19109797

Veterans Law Judge

D. JOHNSON

Decisions by this judge: 1,861 · Granted: 27% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19109797.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.