Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's cervical spine injury is not related to his military service.,There is no evidence that the Veteran’s sleep apnea began in or is related to his active duty service.,The preponderance of the evidence does not demonstrate a link between the Veteran’s heart disease and his service-connected psychiatric disorder.,The Veteran's stomach problems, also claimed as ulcers, did not begin during service or are otherwise related to an in-service injury, event, or illness.,There is no current diagnosis of right ear scars due to a head injury. The claim must be denied.,Residuals of the head injury do not have a link to service and were not caused by it.,The Veteran's migraines are not related to his residuals of a head injury.

The deciding factor: The most probative evidence is against a finding that the Veteran’s cervical spine injury is related to his military service.,The preponderance of the evidence does not demonstrate that the Veteran’s sleep apnea began in or is etiologically related to his active duty service.,The preponderance of the evidence does not demonstrate that the Veteran's heart disease began in, or is etiologically related to, service. ,The preponderance of the evidence does not demonstrate that the Veteran’s stomach problems, also claimed as ulcers, began in or are related to service.,There is no current diagnosis of right ear scars due to a head injury. The claim must be denied.,The preponderance of the evidence does not show that the residuals of the head injury were caused by service.,The Veteran's migraines do not have a link to his residuals of a head injury.

Claimed conditions
cervical spine injury (the neck), sleep apnea, heart disease, stomach problems also claimed as ulcers, right ear scars due to a head injury, residuals of head injury, migraines
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
February 7, 2019
Citation
19109823

Veterans Law Judge

JOHN J CROWLEY

Decisions by this judge: 3,319 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19109823.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.