Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's cervical spine disability is not related to his military service and is not caused or aggravated by his service-connected disabilities.,The Veteran's right leg meralgia paresthetica is not related to his military service and is not caused or aggravated by his service-connected disabilities.,The Veteran's sleep apnea is less likely than not related to his service-connected disabilities, specifically diabetes and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).,The Veteran's headaches are not related to his shell fragment wound in his neck.

The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not provide an opinion as to whether the residuals of the shell fragment wound aggravated the cervical spine disability.,The VA examiner found that meralgia paresthetica is a syndrome of numbness, paresthesia, and dysesthesia over the lateral thigh in the distribution of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve of the thigh. The Veteran's shell fragment wounds to the right thigh are located over the medial and anterior aspect of the thigh rather than the lateral thigh.,The VA examiner stated that diabetes mellitus does not cause meralgia paresthetica, but it is a separate peripheral nerve condition from his meralgia paresthetica. Therefore, the examiner concluded that it is less likely that the Veteran’s meralgia paresthetica has been aggravated by his diabetes.,The VA medical opinion did not discuss whether the Veteran's shell fragment wound in his neck caused or aggravated his sleep apnea.

Claimed conditions
Cervical spine disability, Right leg meralgia paresthetica, Sleep apnea, Headache (migraine)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 7, 2019
Citation
19109868

Veterans Law Judge

ANTHONY C. SCIRÉ, JR

Decisions by this judge: 1,890 · Granted: 32% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19109868.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.