Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's claim to reopen his right hand disability was denied as new and material evidence was not received.,His left arm disability, diagnosed as cubital tunnel syndrome and cervical radiculopathy, is also denied due to lack of in-service injury or disease.,Service connection for neck spasms (spasmodic torticollis) is denied because there is no medical nexus between the condition and service exposure to herbicide agents.,The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disability, diagnosed as bipolar disorder, is denied without a finding of a causal link to service.

The deciding factor: There was no evidence of an in-service injury or disease that could have caused the current right hand disability. The VA examiner found no nexus between the event in service and the Veteran’s current condition.,The Veteran's left arm disability is not related to his military service as there were no complaints, symptoms, or diagnoses during service. The VA examiner concluded that the current diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome does not have a link to service.,There was no evidence linking the Veteran's neck spasms to his military service and exposure to herbicide agents. The VA examiner found cervical dystonia is not associated with either.,The Veteran’s psychiatric disability, bipolar disorder, did not manifest during service or due to any in-service event, injury, or disease. There is also no evidence linking the condition to service.

Claimed conditions
right hand disability, left ulnar mononeuropathy (cubital tunnel syndrome), left C7-8 radiculopathy, spasmodic torticollis (neck muscle spasm/movement disorder), acquired psychiatric disability (bipolar disorder)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 8, 2019
Citation
19110557

Veterans Law Judge

S. HENEKS

Decisions by this judge: 1,726 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19110557.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.