The appeal to reopen the claim of service connection for a neck disability is allowed.,The application to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for a right knee disability is denied.,The application to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for a right ankle disability is denied.,The application to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for a scar of the left eye is denied.,The application to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for a right eye disability, to include insignificant retinal pigment deposits and myopic astigmatism in the right eye (also claimed as benign neoplasm of chorial nevus) is denied.,As new and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim of service connection for a left eye disability, other than a scar of the left eye and to include insignificant retinal pigment deposits and myopic astigmatism in the left eye (also claimed as benign neoplasm of chorial nevus), the appeal to this extent is allowed.,The application to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for hemorrhoids is denied.,The application to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for a left elbow disability, also claimed as nerve damage, is denied.,Entitlement to service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder (PTSD), to include alcohol abuse, anxiety condition, drug abuse, memory loss, mental disorder, and major depression, is denied.
The deciding factor: New and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim of service connection for a neck disability.,Evidence received since the March 2012 rating decision is cumulative and redundant of evidence already of record and does not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claims of service connection for right knee, right ankle, scar of the left eye, right eye disability, left eye disability (other than scar), hemorrhoids, left elbow disability, and acquired psychiatric disorder (PTSD).,Evidence received since the March 2012 rating decision is cumulative and redundant of evidence already of record and does not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim of service connection for right knee disability.,Evidence received since the March 2012 rating decision is cumulative and redundant of evidence already of record and does not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim of service connection for right ankle disability.,Evidence received since the March 2012 rating decision is cumulative and redundant of evidence already of record and does not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim of service connection for scar of the left eye.,Evidence received since the March 2012 rating decision is cumulative and redundant of evidence already of record and does not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim of service connection for right eye disability, to include insignificant retinal pigment deposits and myopic astigmatism (also claimed as benign neoplasm of chorial nevus).,Evidence received since the March 2012 rating decision is new and material because it had not previously been submitted, is not cumulative or redundant of evidence already of record at the time of the prior rating decision, and raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim of service connection for left eye disability other than scar of the left eye.,Evidence received since the March 2012 rating decision is cumulative and redundant of evidence already of record and does not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim of service connection for hemorrhoids.,Evidence received since the August 2015 rating decision is cumulative and redundant of evidence already of record and does not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim of service connection for left elbow disability (also claimed as nerve damage).,New and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen the claim of service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, to include PTSD.
- Claimed conditions
- neck disability, right knee disability, right ankle disability, scar of the left eye, right eye disability, left eye disability (other than scar), hemorrhoids, left elbow disability, acquired psychiatric disorder (PTSD)
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 13, 2019
- Citation
- 19111336
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,050 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19111336.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including a new VA examination to assess his bilateral knee and hip disabilities.
- Partly granted
The Board has not made a final determination on the claims of service connection for inguinal hernia, PTSD, joint pain, fibromyalgia, left knee disability, right knee disability, tinnitus, chronic fatigue syndrome, respiratory disability, sleep disorder, IBS, and headaches. The claims are remanded to obtain additional evidence and determine if these conditions are related to service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claim for service connection of a neck disability due to pre-decisional error in not obtaining a VA examination and medical opinion.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for shin splints, right knee disability, acquired psychiatric disorder (depression), stomach disability, and left ear hearing loss due to errors in providing notice of the right to a hearing.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.