Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's sleep apnea is granted as secondary to his service-connected PTSD and nose fracture residuals with deviated septum and breathing problems.,There is no evidence of a gastrointestinal disorder during or after service, thus the claim for this condition is denied.,Diabetes mellitus was not diagnosed within one year post-service, so it cannot be presumed by law. The Veteran's claim for diabetes mellitus is therefore denied.,The Veteran's neuropathy of the right lower extremity does not meet presumptive criteria and is thus denied.,Neuropathy of the left lower extremity was granted as secondary to Agent Orange exposure.

The deciding factor: The evidence supports a finding that the Veteran’s sleep apnea is caused by his service-connected PTSD and nose fracture residuals with deviated septum and breathing problems, leading to the grant of service connection for this condition.,There is no current diagnosis or evidence linking the Veteran's gastrointestinal disorder to service. The preponderance of evidence weighs against finding a current disability related to service.,The Veteran does not have diabetes mellitus within one year post-service, and there is insufficient evidence to confirm its presence at any time during the appeal period. Therefore, the claim for diabetes mellitus is denied.,Neuropathy of the right lower extremity was not diagnosed or linked to service, thus it cannot be granted as a presumptive condition under Agent Orange exposure.,The Veteran's neuropathy of the left lower extremity meets the criteria for presumptive service connection due to Agent Orange exposure.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus, gastrointestinal disorder, neuropathy of the left lower extremity, neuropathy of the right lower extremity, sleep apnea
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 21, 2019
Citation
19112903

Veterans Law Judge

THOMAS H. O'SHAY

Decisions by this judge: 2,050 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19112903.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.