Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for acute necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis is denied as it does not qualify as a compensable disability.,Service connection for lumbar sprain, bilateral knee disability, and obstructive sleep apnea is denied due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to service.,The Veteran's claim for morbid obesity is denied because obesity is not considered a compensable disability under VA regulations.,Service connection for atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure is remanded as the relationship between current diagnoses and in-service chest pain needs further evaluation.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's claim for service connection for acute necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis cannot be granted as it does not qualify as a compensable disability under VA regulations.,Service connection is denied because there is no evidence linking the current disabilities to service, and none of the post-service evidence relates any current findings of the disabilities to his military service.,Morbid obesity is not considered a compensable disability for VA purposes. Therefore, the claim for service connection for morbid obesity must be denied.,The relationship between current diagnoses (atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure) and in-service chest pain needs further evaluation.

Claimed conditions
acute necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis, lumbar sprain, bilateral knee disability, obstructive sleep apnea, morbid obesity, atriial fibrillation, congestive heart failure
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 1, 2019
Citation
19114946

Veterans Law Judge

LESLEY A. REIN

Decisions by this judge: 2,240 · Granted: 28% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19114946.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.