The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient examination and opinion regarding whether an MRI is necessary for evaluating the Veteran's right shoulder disability, which could affect his rating.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not provide a clear rationale for why an MRI study was or was not deemed necessary, leading to inadequate consideration of relevant facts.
- Claimed conditions
- Right shoulder limitation of motion
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 28, 2019
- Citation
- 19114984
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,960 · Granted: 36% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19114984.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases due to insufficient development, specifically a need for a VA examination with range of motion testing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate opinions regarding the presence of residuals from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma on January 1, 2018. The Veteran's claim will be reconsidered with appropriate ratings for all identified residuals.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims of entitlement to higher ratings for his right shoulder limitation of motion and recurrent dislocation due to inadequate examinations in previous rating decisions. The Veteran is required to undergo a new examination that includes testing for pain on both active and passive motion, as well as retrospective opinions regarding functional loss during the entire appeal period.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 20 percent for right shoulder limitation of motion prior to August 17, 2018 is being remanded due to insufficient evidence regarding the severity during flare-ups.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.