Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's initial claims for increased ratings have been denied as her arthritis of the thumbs, index fingers, long fingers, ring fingers, and little fingers do not meet the criteria for a higher rating under applicable diagnostic codes. The Veteran's arthritis of the right knee and feet were also found to not warrant an increase in rating.,The Veteran's service connection claim for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome has been remanded.

The deciding factor: The objective evidence does not support findings that would warrant a higher rating under applicable diagnostic codes. The Veteran's arthritis of the thumbs, index fingers, long fingers, ring fingers, and little fingers do not meet the criteria for a higher rating.,The Veteran's service connection claim for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome has been remanded as there is insufficient information to determine if it should be granted.

Claimed conditions
Arthritis of the left foot, Arthritis of the left index finger, Arthritis of the left knee, Arthritis of the left little finger, Arthritis of the left long finger, Arthritis of the left ring finger, Arthritis of the left thumb, Arthritis of the right foot, Arthritis of the right index finger, Arthritis of the right knee, Arthritis of the right little finger, Arthritis of the right long finger, Arthritis of the right ring finger, Arthritis of the right thumb
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 28, 2019
Citation
19115037

Veterans Law Judge

KELLI A. KORDICH

Decisions by this judge: 2,287 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19115037.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.