Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's allergic rhinitis and non-allergic rhinitis with sinusitis were without polyps and did not produce incapacitating episodes prior to January 30, 2019. As of January 30, 2019, the Veteran’s symptoms met a 10 percent rating under DC 6522.,The Veteran's allergic rhinitis and non-allergic rhinitis with sinusitis were without polyps and manifested by greater than 50 percent obstruction of the nasal passage on both sides as of January 30, 2019. The symptoms did not produce incapacitating episodes or more than six non-incapacitating episodes per year.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for food allergies including oral allergy syndrome and anaphylaxis is remanded.

The deciding factor: Prior to January 30, 2019, the Veteran did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under DC 6522 due to lack of polyps and less than 50 percent obstruction.,As of January 30, 2019, the Veteran's symptoms met the criteria for a 10 percent rating under DC 6522 as they were greater than 50 percent obstructed on both sides but did not meet the criteria for higher ratings due to lack of incapacitating episodes or more than six non-incapacitating episodes per year.,The claim for service connection for food allergies is remanded because it involves a distinct disability that has not been previously adjudicated.

Claimed conditions
Allergic rhinitis, Non-allergic rhinitis with sinusitis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 4, 2019
Citation
19115231

Veterans Law Judge

JOHN Z. JONES

Decisions by this judge: 2,341 · Granted: 33% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19115231.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.