Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for DM II is remanded to obtain an addendum opinion.,The Veteran's leg pain issue is dismissed as the Veteran withdrew it from appeal.,Service connection for OSA is granted, with a finding that his current diagnosis of OSA is related to his active military service.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a thyroid disorder is remanded due to lack of evidence on direct or presumptive basis.,The Veteran's hip disability rating issue is remanded as the VA examination was conducted in 2017 and he testified that symptoms have worsened.

The deciding factor: An addendum opinion is needed to address whether the Veteran’s DM II is related to his service-connected disabilities or other factors.,The Veteran withdrew his leg pain issue from appeal, thus it is dismissed.,The Board finds that OSA had its onset during active service based on the Veteran's testimony and medical evidence.,No presumptive basis for thyroid disorder was found, so a direct service connection examination is needed.,A new VA examination is required to assess the current severity of the Veteran’s hip disability.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus type II (DM II), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), thyroid disorder, residuals of posterior iliac crest injury of the right hip with sensory deficit to include the sciatic nerve
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 1, 2019
Citation
19115255

Veterans Law Judge

S. B. MAYS

Decisions by this judge: 1,990 · Granted: 35% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19115255.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.