The Board has determined that there are issues related to when the prostate cancer with metastasis to the bone became manifest after service and was not manifest to a compensable degree as specified in 38 C.F.R. § 3.307 or 38 C.F.R. § 3.309, and has therefore remanded the case for further development.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there are issues related to when the disease became manifest after service and was not manifest to a compensable degree as specified in 38 C.F.R. § 3.307 or 38 C.F.R. § 3.309, and thus remanded for further development.
- Claimed conditions
- prostate cancer with metastasis to the bone
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- Ionizing radiation
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 1, 2019
- Citation
- 19115462
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,030 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19115462.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for prostate cancer with metastasis to the bone, finding that it was not related to any disease, injury, or event during service, including exposure to ionizing radiation.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinion regarding the cause of death and negligence in treatment. The Veteran's cause of death is being reviewed for potential service connection under new evidence.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the case must be referred to VA's Under Secretary for Benefits due to a potential radiation exposure claim. The appellant is seeking service connection for prostate cancer with metastasis to the bone, which she contends was caused by ionizing radiation exposure during military service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.