The Veteran's service connection for high cholesterol is denied as it is not a disability for which VA benefits can be granted.,The Veteran's initial rating for diabetes mellitus type II remains at 10 percent and no higher. The evidence does not support an increased rating.,The reduction in the rating for CAD, status post CABG from 60% to 30% is remanded as there was no effective date provided.,The issues of whether the effective date of the reduction in rating for CAD, status post CABG should be addressed along with the issue of whether the reduction itself was proper. These are also remanded.,The Veteran's respiratory disorder remains unestablished and not related to service or herbicide exposure.,Hypertension is presumed due to service but its etiology cannot be determined from the evidence provided.,Service connection for tremors, left arm disorder, right arm disorder, reflex conditions of extremities, back disorder, sleep apnea, skin cancer, and headaches are all remanded as their relationship to service or herbicide exposure needs further clarification.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's high cholesterol is a laboratory finding and not a disability for which VA benefits can be granted.,Diabetes mellitus did not require insulin or use of oral hypoglycemic for treatment over the appeals period, so no higher rating is warranted.,The reduction in CAD rating from 60% to 30% was not accompanied by an effective date and thus needs further clarification.,Issues related to the reduction in CAD rating are intertwined with issues regarding its effective date. These need to be addressed together.,There is no evidence of a respiratory disorder that can be linked to service or herbicide exposure, so service connection cannot be established.,Hypertension is presumed due to service but its etiology needs further clarification as the Veteran's medical records do not provide sufficient information.,Service connection for tremors, left arm disorder, right arm disorder, reflex conditions of extremities, back disorder, sleep apnea, skin cancer, and headaches are all remanded as their relationship to service or herbicide exposure needs further clarification.
- Claimed conditions
- high cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, respiratory disorder, hypertension
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 1, 2019
- Citation
- 19115471
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,863 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19115471.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including VA examinations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for additional development due to conflicting opinions regarding service connection for peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, and skin disabilities related to herbicide exposure.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension and increased rating for anxiety disorder have been denied. The Board found that there is no evidence of a current disability meeting the criteria for hypertension, and the Veteran's anxiety disorder does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.