The claims for avascular necrosis of the hips and COPD are remanded due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the etiology of these conditions.
The deciding factor: The VA examiners failed to address the Veteran's exposure to ionizing radiation during service, which is a known risk factor for avascular necrosis. The COPD claim also lacks sufficient explanation regarding the relationship between spontaneous pneumothorax and COPD.
- Claimed conditions
- {"condition_name":"Avascular necrosis, right hip","claimed_condition":"bilateral avascular necrosis"}, {"condition_name":"Avascular necrosis, left hip","claimed_condition":"bilateral avascular necrosis"}, {"condition_name":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)","claimed_condition":"chronic obstructive pulmonary disease"}
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 7, 2019
- Citation
- 19116515
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19116515.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.