The Board has remanded the cases for further development to obtain medical records and a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's left ankle pain and back pain are related to his military service.
The deciding factor: The claims were not fully developed as required by law, including obtaining all relevant medical records and conducting a thorough VA examination.
- Claimed conditions
- Left Ankle Pain, Back Pain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 7, 2019
- Citation
- 19116800
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,549 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19116800.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that new evidence, including private treatment records and a hearing transcript, warrants readjudicating the claim for service connection of a back pain disability. The Veteran's current condition is not related to his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC and whether it is in his best interest. The VA will need to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the Veteran's mental ability without supervision, as well as determine if C.N.B. is suitable as the primary caregiver.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claim for SMC based on aid and attendance due to a pre-decisional error in not considering evidence submitted by the Veteran within the applicable evidentiary window. The AOJ is required to obtain an opinion from an appropriate clinician regarding whether the Veteran's service-connected disabilities result in the need for A&A.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran requires personal care services due to his psychiatric and musculoskeletal disorders, but further evaluation is needed to determine if participation in PCAFC is in his best interest. The AOJ must provide a new decision with proper notice.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.