Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD has been granted.,New and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim of service connection for granuloma (also claimed as sarcoidosis and skin condition).,The Veteran's claim for service connection for sleep apnea is remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for granuloma (also claimed as sarcoidosis and skin condition) is remanded.,The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for pseudofolliculitis barbae is remanded.,The Veteran's claim for TDIU due to service-connected disabilities is remanded.

The deciding factor: The Veteran has a current diagnosis of PTSD that is related to his military service, including serving in the DMZ in Korea and dealing with incoming fire across the DMZ.,Additional evidence received after the December 2008 rating decision relates to unestablished facts necessary to substantiate the claim for service connection for granuloma (also claimed as sarcoidosis and skin condition), raising a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim.,The Veteran's sleep apnea is related to his military service, including trouble sleeping while in service, including waking up in the middle of the night choking for air.,The nature and etiology of any granuloma/sarcoidosis are unclear due to lack of a VA examiner opinion. The Veteran’s treating physician provided a statement indicating it is at least as possible as not that exposure to hazardous chemicals while he was in the military could have contributed to his diagnosis, but did not provide sufficient rationale for this opinion.,The current severity of the Veteran's pseudofolliculitis barbae needs to be determined through an examination by an appropriate clinician. The examiner should attempt to elicit information regarding the severity, frequency, and duration of any flare-ups, and the degree of functional loss during flare-ups.,TDIU is dependent upon the impact of the Veteran's service-connected disabilities on his ability to obtain or retain substantially gainful employment.

Claimed conditions
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Granuloma (also claimed as sarcoidosis and skin condition), Sleep Apnea, Pseudofolliculitis Barbae
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 11, 2019
Citation
19117082

Veterans Law Judge

A. ISHIZAWAR

Decisions by this judge: 1,797 · Granted: 20% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19117082.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.