The Board has determined that the evidence is not sufficient to determine if the Veteran needs regular aid and attendance solely due to his service-connected bronchitis with bronchiectasis. The case is being remanded for further evaluation.
The deciding factor: The need for aid and attendance must be evaluated based on the Veteran's service-connected disability, which in this case is bronchitis with bronchiectasis rated as 100 percent disabling.
- Claimed conditions
- bronchitis with bronchiectasis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 11, 2019
- Citation
- 19117633
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,421 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19117633.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities (bronchitis with bronchiectasis and depressive disorder) have rendered him unemployable, meeting the criteria for a TDIU.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected bronchitis with bronchiectasis has rendered him unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation, leading to the grant of TDIU.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for sinusitis and a rating in excess of 30 percent for bronchitis with bronchiectasis. The veteran's claims were remanded to obtain additional evidence, but the case is being returned due to new information provided by the veteran.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.