The Veteran's service connection claims for a cardiovascular disorder and chronic lymphocytic leukemia were denied as there was no evidence of in-service injury or disease, and the disorders did not manifest within one year of separation from service. The Board found that the medical evidence did not support a nexus between the current conditions and service.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not establish a causal relationship between the Veteran's current cardiovascular disorder (atrial fibrillation) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia and his military service, including exposure to asbestos or lead paint.
- Claimed conditions
- Cardiovascular disorder (Atrial fibrillation), Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 19, 2019
- Citation
- 19119265
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,162 · Granted: 21% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19119265.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's income was above the maximum annual pension rate, denying survivor's pension.,There is no indication that any of the Veteran's conditions are related to service, thus denying DIC benefits.,VA did not owe the Veteran any periodic monetary benefits at the time of his death, denying accrued benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded both the DIC benefits pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 1151 and service connection for the cause of death claims due to insufficient medical opinions addressing the appellant's contentions regarding timely diagnosis and treatment of the Veteran’s UTI, sepsis, and other conditions.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service connection for chronic lymphocytic leukemia is granted due to presumed exposure to herbicide agents during his service at U-Tapao Royal Thai Air Force Base.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a medical opinion regarding the cause of death and service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.