Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's claims for effective dates prior to July 31, 2006 and service connection were denied. The Board found that there was no factually ascertainable increase in the Veteran’s hemorrhoids within a year of her claim, and that she did not submit a formal or informal claim for bilateral pes planus with plantar fasciitis, gastroenteritis with fundic gland polyp, or left knee scars prior to July 31, 2006. The effective dates assigned were the date of receipt of claims.,The Veteran's initial rating in excess of 30 percent for bilateral pes planus and her initial compensable rating for left knee scars were denied. The Board found that there was no factually ascertainable increase in the Veteran’s bilateral pes planus with plantar fasciitis within a year of her claim, and that she did not submit a formal or informal claim for gastroenteritis with fundic gland polyp or left knee scars prior to July 6, 2004.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's claims were denied because there was no factually ascertainable increase in her hemorrhoids within the year prior to her July 31, 2006 claim for an increased rating. The effective date assigned was the date of receipt of her claim.,The Veteran's initial rating in excess of 30 percent for bilateral pes planus and her initial compensable rating for left knee scars were denied because there was no factually ascertainable increase in her bilateral pes planus with plantar fasciitis within a year prior to her July 31, 2006 claim. The effective dates assigned were the date of receipt of her claims.

Claimed conditions
Bilateral Pes Planus with Plantar Fasciitis, Gastroenteritis with Fundic Gland Polyp, Hemorrhoids, Left Knee Scars
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 26, 2019
Citation
19121761

Veterans Law Judge

Vito A. Clementi

Decisions by this judge: 2,242 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19121761.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.