Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's service connection claim for hypertension is denied as there is no evidence of a current disability, and the Board finds that any hypertension diagnosed post-service is not related to his military service.,The Veteran's service connection claim for a penis disability is denied as there is no evidence of a current disability, and the Board finds that any penis disability diagnosed post-service is not related to his military service.,The Veteran's service connection claim for psychiatric disorder (depressive disorder due to another medical condition with depressed features) is granted as it is proximately due to or the result of his service-connected tinnitus, bilateral hearing loss, and hepatitis C.,The Veteran's service connection claim for hepatitis C is granted based on new evidence that reopened the previously denied claim.

The deciding factor: There is no medical evidence showing a current diagnosis of hypertension during active service or within one year post-service. The Board finds that any hypertension diagnosed after service is not related to his military service.,The Veteran's STRs do not show any complaints, diagnoses, or treatment for a penis disability. There is also no medical evidence linking any current penis disability to his military service.,The psychiatric disorder (depressive disorder due to another medical condition with depressed features) is proximately due to or the result of his service-connected tinnitus, bilateral hearing loss, and hepatitis C.,The Veteran's previously denied claim for hepatitis C was reopened based on new evidence. The current diagnosis of hepatitis C is not related to his military service.

Claimed conditions
hypertension, penis disability, psychiatric disorder (depressive disorder due to another medical condition with depressed features), hepatitis C
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
0%
Decision date
March 26, 2019
Citation
19122440

Veterans Law Judge

ROBERT C. SCHARNBERGER

Decisions by this judge: 631 · Granted: 21% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19122440.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.