The Board found that the Veteran was exposed to herbicide agents in the Korean DMZ and granted service connection for the cause of his death due to lung cancer, which is associated with such exposure.
The deciding factor: The Board resolved reasonable doubt in favor of the appellant regarding the Veteran's exposure to herbicide agents in the Korean DMZ, leading to the grant of service connection for the cause of death.
- Claimed conditions
- carcinoma of the lungs
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Gulf War
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 2, 2019
- Citation
- 19124052
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,810 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19124052.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the claim of service connection for cause of death due to lack of evidence of exposure to herbicide agents or radiation during service, and thus, the Veteran's lung cancer is not considered a service-connected disability.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected COPD was denied as it is not related to his active service or secondary to his service-connected carcinoma of the lungs. The Board also found that he did not meet the criteria for a TDIU prior to April 1, 2013.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection of carcinoma of the lungs and pneumonia are being remanded due to incomplete development, including a need for clarification on whether he wishes to testify before the Board.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development and readjudication, including consideration of new evidence submitted by the Veteran.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.