The appeal with respect to the Veteran’s entitlement to service connection for atrial fibrillation (claimed as a heart condition), to include as due to exposure to herbicide agents, is dismissed. The RO denied service connection for an enlarged prostate in October 2017 and continued current disability ratings for PTSD, bilateral hearing loss, DJD of the right knee, and right knee instability in May 2018. The Veteran asked that his appeal with respect to entitlement to service connection for a heart condition be canceled prior to promulgation of a Board decision.
The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the issue of service connection for atrial fibrillation (claimed as a heart condition) by asking that his appeal be canceled in March 2018, before the Board made a decision on the matter.
- Claimed conditions
- atrial fibrillation (claimed as a heart condition), enlarged prostate
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 2, 2019
- Citation
- 19124194
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,757 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19124194.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to his death. The claims for service connection and rating of various conditions have not progressed further.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for hypertension and enlarged prostate, finding that the Veteran did not serve in the Korean DMZ or otherwise expose to herbicide agents during his active duty. The evidence did not support a nexus between the conditions and service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for an enlarged prostate, incontinence, and steroid-induced diabetes mellitus type II are being remanded due to the AOJ not considering his private treatment records.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for an enlarged prostate, a skin condition (papulosquamous dermatitis), and a peripheral nerve injury of the thumb and elbow due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to service or any other relevant factors.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.