Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Board denied service connection for residuals of a bunionectomy (claimed as bunion left foot) due to the lack of evidence showing that the condition began during active service or was related to an in-service injury or disease.,The Board denied service connection for residuals of a uvulectomy because there is no indication that the appellant's disability developed during his period of active duty and it is not related to any in-service injury or disease.,The Board denied service connection for hypertension as there was no evidence showing its onset during active service or being related to an in-service injury or disease. The appellant did not serve in Southwest Asia or Vietnam, but he claimed exposure to environmental hazards from the Gulf War and Agent Orange.,The Board denied service connection for residuals of gall bladder surgery due to lack of evidence showing that the condition began during active service or was related to an in-service injury or disease.

The deciding factor: The preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding that the appellant's bunion, uvula, hypertension, or gallbladder issues are linked to his military service.,There is no indication of a left foot bunion during active duty and no evidence linking it to an in-service injury. The surgery was performed after separation from active duty.,The Board found that the appellant's hypertension diagnosis occurred outside the presumptive period for exposure to Agent Orange or Gulf War illness, and there is no credible evidence supporting his claims of exposure to environmental hazards during service.,There is insufficient evidence showing a connection between the gallbladder surgery and military service.

Claimed conditions
residuals of a bunionectomy (claimed as bunion left foot), residuals of a uvulectomy, hypertension, residuals of gall bladder surgery
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 3, 2019
Citation
19125101

Veterans Law Judge

K. Conner

Decisions by this judge: 1,810 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19125101.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.