Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for a higher disability rating for ischemic heart disease has been denied.,Service connection for atrial fibrillation secondary to service-connected ischemic heart disease has been granted.,The Veteran's claims for non-degenerative arthritis and fibromyalgia, both related to herbicide exposure, have been remanded for further review.,Further medical opinions are needed regarding the etiology of the Veteran's non-degenerative arthritis and fibromyalgia.

The deciding factor: The Veteran’s ischemic heart disease is currently rated as 60 percent disabling due to its impact on his ability to work, but a higher rating is not warranted.,Service connection for atrial fibrillation has been granted because the condition is secondary to service-connected ischemic heart disease.,Further medical opinions are needed regarding the etiology of non-degenerative arthritis and fibromyalgia as they may be related to herbicide exposure, but this relationship has not yet been established with certainty.,The Veteran's claims for non-degenerative arthritis and fibromyalgia have been remanded because there is insufficient evidence to determine their relation to service.

Claimed conditions
Ischemic Heart Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Non-degenerative Arthritis, Fibromyalgia
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 5, 2019
Citation
19126111

Veterans Law Judge

KRISTI L. GUNN

Decisions by this judge: 2,062 · Granted: 34% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19126111.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.