Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The Board dismissed the appeal of the claim for bilateral plantar fasciitis due to the Veteran's withdrawal during a hearing.,Service connection is granted for chronic fatigue syndrome, with consideration given to the Veteran's lay statements and service records indicating symptoms during service. The disability meets the criteria under 38 C.F.R. § 3.317(a)(2)(b).,Service connection is granted for obstructive sleep apnea based on the Veteran's personal testimony and statements from fellow servicemembers.,Service connection is granted for alopecia areata, with consideration given to the lack of clinical evidence at the time of examination.

The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding bilateral plantar fasciitis during a hearing. The Board dismissed this issue as a result.,For chronic fatigue syndrome, the evidence is in equipoise and favorable to the Veteran's claim, meeting the criteria for service connection under 38 C.F.R. § 3.317(a)(2)(b).,The Veteran reported symptoms of snoring and hair loss during his deployment to Iraq, which were corroborated by fellow servicemembers' statements. The Board found these sufficient to establish a link between the current condition and service.,For alopecia areata, the VA examiner concluded that there was no clinical evidence at the time of examination supporting a connection to service.

Claimed conditions
bilateral plantar fasciitis, chronic fatigue syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea, alopecia areata
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 12, 2019
Citation
19128238

Veterans Law Judge

K. Conner

Decisions by this judge: 1,810 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19128238.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.