Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's service-connected PTSD has prevented him from securing and maintaining gainful employment during the appeal period, leading to a grant of TDIU.,Medical evidence is needed to determine if the Veteran’s obstructive sleep apnea was caused or aggravated by his service-connected conditions or medications.,Medical evidence is needed to determine if the Veteran's hypertension was caused or aggravated by his service-connected conditions or medications.,Medical evidence is needed to determine if the Veteran has a medically unexplained chronic multi-symptom illness and what its manifestations are.,Medical evidence is needed to determine if the Veteran has erectile dysfunction and whether it is related to his service-connected conditions or medications.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's PTSD prevented him from securing gainful employment during the appeal period, leading to a grant of TDIU.,There are medical questions regarding the relationship between the Veteran’s obstructive sleep apnea and his service-connected conditions or medications.,There are medical questions regarding the relationship between the Veteran's hypertension and his service-connected conditions or medications.,The Veteran has reported signs and symptoms that may indicate a medically unexplained chronic multi-symptom illness, but further examination is needed to confirm this.,The Veteran has reported erectile dysfunction, which needs to be confirmed and evaluated for its relation to his service-connected conditions or medications.

Claimed conditions
obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, medically unexplained chronic multi-symptom illness, erectile dysfunction, seizures
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 11, 2019
Citation
19128440

Veterans Law Judge

E. I. VELEZ

Decisions by this judge: 2,549 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19128440.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.