The Board has vacated the part of its March 2017 decision that found the July 1993 rating action was final, and granted an effective date of March 18, 1993 for service connection of neck injury residuals.
The deciding factor: The claim to reopen was pending since March 1993, which is considered the date entitlement arose.
- Claimed conditions
- posterior and anterior cervical fusions, residual pain, decreased range of motion (neck injury residuals)
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 12, 2019
- Citation
- 19128475
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,020 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19128475.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's back disorder, finding that it is related to his military service. The decision resolves all doubts in favor of the Veteran.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case for an independent medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran experienced any additional disability as a result of treatment he received from VA, and if so, whether it was caused by carelessness or negligence.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's left ring finger disability, which includes a healed fracture with residual pain, has been evaluated at 0 percent disabling under Diagnostic Code 5230. The Board finds no provision for a higher rating and denies the claim.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has determined that the veteran's hepatitis and other disabilities are not related to VA medical treatment on August 4, 1999. The claim is denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.