The Board has remanded the case for further development due to a prior examination not addressing potential neurologic pathology.
The deciding factor: The prior VA examination did not address potential neurologic components of the Veteran's symptoms, which is required by the Court’s decision.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic physical flushing, changes in body temperature
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 12, 2019
- Citation
- 19128638
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.