The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is currently rated as noncompensable.,Prior to April 13, 2017, the Veteran’s prostate cancer was rated at 20 percent. From April 13, 2017, it has been rated at 20 percent.,PTSD prior to April 7, 2017 was rated as noncompensable; from April 7, 2017, it is rated at 30 percent.,The Veteran's prostate cancer does not meet the criteria for a higher rating. PTSD meets the criteria for a 30 percent rating but not higher.
The deciding factor: The evidence shows that the Veteran’s erectile dysfunction is productive of loss of erectile power, but no deformity of the penis.,Prior to April 13, 2017, the prostate cancer residuals included urine leakage not requiring absorbent materials and no urinary frequency. From April 13, 2017, they include urine leakage requiring absorbent materials that must be changed less than two times a day and no urinary frequency.,PTSD prior to April 7, 2017 was productive of a formally diagnosed mental condition but not severe enough to interfere with occupational and social functioning or require continuous medication. From April 7, 2017, it has been productive of occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform tasks.
- Claimed conditions
- Erectile Dysfunction, Prostate Cancer, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 16, 2019
- Citation
- 19128997
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,913 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19128997.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is granted as the evidence shows a current diagnosis of PTSD, an in-service stressor, and a medical link between the two.
- Denied
The Veteran's PTSD has been rated at 50% since March 23, 2004. The Board found that a higher rating is not warranted prior to February 15, 2005 due to the severity of his symptoms and their impact on his social and occupational functioning.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD and any acquired psychiatric disorder, finding that there was no evidence to support a link between his current mental health conditions and his military service.
- Granted
The Veteran's PTSD resulted in occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity, warranting a 70% disability rating. The Veteran also met the criteria for a TDIU due to his service-connected disabilities preventing him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.