Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's parasomnia with recurrent isolated sleep paralysis is not service-connected.,Service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder to include mood disorder NOS and a panic disorder has been granted.,An increased evaluation for cervical strain remains denied.,An increased evaluation for thoracolumbar strain remains denied.,The Veteran's claim of entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 10 percent disabling for the service-connected degenerative arthritis, left knee is dismissed.,The Veteran's claim of entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for the service-connected degenerative arthritis, right knee has not been met.,Service connection for chest pain remains denied.,An increased evaluation for left upper extremity scar remains denied.,A compensable rating for left wrist injury (also claimed as suicide attempt injury) remains denied.,An increased evaluation for right foot hallux valgus remains denied.,Service connection for herpes remains denied.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's parasomnia with recurrent isolated sleep paralysis is not service-connected due to lack of diagnosis and no evidence linking the condition to service. The acquired psychiatric disorder, including mood disorder NOS and a panic disorder, was diagnosed during active service and has continued thereafter.

Claimed conditions
parasomnia with recurrent isolated sleep paralysis, mood disorder NOS, panic disorder
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 16, 2019
Citation
19129231

Veterans Law Judge

Evan M. Deichert

Decisions by this judge: 1,446 · Granted: 21% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19129231.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.