The Veteran's service-connected depressive disorder is being remanded for further evaluation and rating consideration.
The deciding factor: Further examination is needed to determine the current severity of the Veteran's depressive disorder, unspecified.
- Claimed conditions
- depressive disorder, unspecified
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 17, 2019
- Citation
- 19129732
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,480 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19129732.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied an initial evaluation greater than 70 percent for depressive disorder, unspecified as the evidence did not show total occupational and social impairment.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's request for an earlier effective date for service connection of his acquired psychiatric disorder. The decision became final in October 2012 and July 2015, and no new evidence was submitted within one year.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder as secondary to his service-connected disabilities is being remanded due to the need for a new VA examination and opinion regarding the relationship between his psychiatric condition and his service-connected conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to new allegations from the Veteran regarding in-service stressors and a need for an addendum opinion on the etiology of his psychiatric disorders.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.