The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's current right foot skin disorder is related to his service.
The deciding factor: The examiner must provide an opinion on whether it is at least as likely as not that the Veteran's chronic tinea pedis of the right foot manifested during or is otherwise related to his period of active service.
- Claimed conditions
- right foot skin disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 17, 2019
- Citation
- 19129958
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,960 · Granted: 36% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19129958.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral foot skin disorders due to Gulf War environmental exposures. The July 2021 VA examination provided conflicting opinions and further clarification is needed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that a timely substantive appeal was not filed to the June 2015 SOC regarding service connection for multiple conditions. The case is REMANDED for issuance of an SOC and allowing the Veteran to perfect his appeal.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for left and right foot skin disorders, attributing them to Gulf War environmental exposure. The evidence does not support a finding that these conditions are related to service or any in-service injury.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to conflicting evidence regarding the etiology of his left knee disability, right foot disability, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. The claims are being returned for further examination and medical opinion.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.