The Veteran's appeal for service connection for poor vision has been denied. The Veteran was not shown to have any visual impairment beyond refractive error, which is a developmental defect and not a compensable disability.,The Veteran's appeals for initial compensable ratings for residuals of right and left fifth hammer toe arthroplasty have been denied. The VA examination did not find all toes affected by hammer toes, thus preventing the assignment of a higher rating under DC 5282.,The Veteran's appeal for service connection for residuals of ventral hernia repair has been remanded due to incomplete records and need for an addendum opinion.
The deciding factor: Service connection may not be granted for refractive error of the eyes, including hyperopia, astigmatism, and presbyopia, even if visual acuity decreased in service.,There is no evidence of hammer toes of all toes, unliteral without claw foot. The Veteran's current foot disabilities do not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under DC 5282.,The VA examiner did not address the Veteran’s reported diagnosis of a hernia more than six months prior to her August 2007 emergency room visit.
- Claimed conditions
- poor vision, residuals of right fifth hammer toe arthroplasty, residuals of left fifth hammer toe arthroplasty, residuals of ventral hernia repair
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 18, 2019
- Citation
- 19130629
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 317 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19130629.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a missed VA examination and the need for additional medical opinions regarding service connection for poor vision.
- Dismissed
The Board denied the veteran's appeal for service connection for various conditions as the appeals were not timely filed.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for hypertension and poor vision, finding no evidence of a causal relationship between the conditions and the Veteran's active service.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeal for service connection for a back disability, hearing loss, poor vision, right foot disability, and left foot disability due to an impermissible concurrent election.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.