The Veteran's motion to revise or reverse the December 1992 rating decision regarding service connection for arrhythmia was denied. The motion to revise or reverse on the basis of CUE in the December 1992 rating decision denying service connection for a thoracic spine condition is remanded.,Service connection for history of arrhythmia, secondary to sustained hypertension, remains unresolved.
The deciding factor: The correct facts were before the RO at the time of the December 1992 rating decision regarding service connection for arrhythmia. The evidence did not clearly and unmistakably show that a separate disability rating was warranted.,Service connection for the thoracic spine condition remains unresolved due to insufficient evidence being available at the time of the December 1992 rating decision.
- Claimed conditions
- History of arrhythmia, Thoracic spine condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 22, 2019
- Citation
- 19130840
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,050 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19130840.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for cervical spine, thoracic spine, bilateral hearing loss, and hypertension due to issues with obtaining SSA records, VA examinations not providing adequate reasons or bases, and unclear discussions of the presumption of soundness. The case is being returned to the Board for compliance with these directives.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claims for cervical and thoracic spine conditions due to insufficient medical opinion regarding the etiology of these conditions. The Veteran's in-service fall is considered, but other potential causes are also discussed.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a low back condition and a thoracic spine condition as they were not related to any incident of service.
- Denied
The Board found that the veteran's spine conditions are not proximately due to or the result of his service-connected right knee disability, nor were they directly related to any remote incident of service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.